Research entry

Retention schedules for records of care-experienced and adopted people held by organisations in England and Wales: Final report

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Retention schedules for records of care-experienced and adopted people held by organisations in England and Wales: Final report

Sarah Wickham · Archives and Records Association / Chief Archivists in Local Government Group

Desk research and three November 2024 focus groups examined adoption and care records and preservation arrangements. Twenty-four people attended, mainly professionals, including three with experience requesting their own records. Participants identified important material beyond individual case files and difficulties with responsibility for older records, agency changes and digital preservation.

Limitations: The focus groups mainly represent recordkeeping professionals; three record requesters cannot be assumed to be three adoptees. Regional reporting includes Northern Ireland despite the England/Wales organisational focus. Recommendations are proposed practice, not evidence of changed law or improved outcomes. Earlier CALGG findings are reused and not independent replication. The report was commissioned by CALGG within the Archives and Records Association, with support from member services and Welsh Government. It examines institutions’ own recordkeeping responsibilities; readers may consider this commissioning relationship.

Research type
Commissioned research report
Source reviewed
Full text
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Mixed
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Mixed

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: CALGG care and adoption records research

Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research

The report was commissioned by CALGG within the Archives and Records Association, with support from member services and Welsh Government. It examines institutions’ own recordkeeping responsibilities; readers may consider this commissioning relationship.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: adoption system, professional perspectives, Records access, research methodology

Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England / Wales

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_ee51ff8a4a41420a

Read the source for Retention schedules for records of care-experienced and adopted people held by organisations in England and Wales: Final report (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry