Research entry

Family Routes: children who returned to care after leaving for adoption or to live with a special guardian

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Family Routes: children who returned to care after leaving for adoption or to live with a special guardian

Julie Selwyn, Julian Gardiner · Department for Education, Research Report RR1560

Researchers used linked English social-care records to examine return to care following 70,170 adoptions and 48,020 special guardianship orders. Estimated return-to-care rates at eight years were about 2% after adoption and 10% after special guardianship. Older age at the permanence order was associated with higher risk, and the report followed children’s subsequent placements after return to care.

Limitations: Adoption and special guardianship are distinct routes with different child and family characteristics. Return to recorded care does not capture all family separation, distress or informal living arrangements and can include temporary returns. Follow-up lengths varied, so estimated rates should not be confused with simple percentages of the entire sample. Children did not directly supply this administrative evidence. Government or public-body commissioned/published research concerning adoption, care or education systems. Readers may take the commissioning/publication relationship and the body’s role in those systems into account.

Research type
Longitudinal linked administrative-data study
Source reviewed
Full text
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Children / Adolescents
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Children; adolescents

Adoption context: Adoption from care

Programme: Family Routes

Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research

Government or public-body commissioned/published research concerning adoption, care or education systems. Readers may take the commissioning/publication relationship and the body’s role in those systems into account.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: administrative data, adoption disruption, adoption from care, data linkage, longitudinal, placement outcomes, UK research

Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England, United Kingdom

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_cf150d7bd59f47e0

Read the source for Family Routes: children who returned to care after leaving for adoption or to live with a special guardian (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry