Adopting Minds — a mentalization-based therapy for families in a post-adoption support service: preliminary evaluation and service user experience
A preliminary evaluation studied 36 families referred to Adopting Minds, a six-session mentalization-based family therapy service, and interviewed five families completing therapy. Available before-and-after data showed improvements in mental health and parental confidence. Parents described a supportive setting, though some wanted longer or additional treatment.
Limitations: Incomplete outcome data, a small interview sample and no randomised comparison limit causal conclusions. Referred families do not represent all adoptees. Only the publisher-deposited abstract was reviewed; regional coverage and additional methods are not inferred where unstated. Related programme publications may use overlapping participants; these are separate publications, not independent replications. UK research context does not confirm an exclusively England/Wales sample. Two authors were affiliated with Coram, an adoption service provider; the study evaluated a post-adoption therapy service. Provider involvement and incomplete outcome data should be considered when interpreting findings. Evidence-provider note: this service evaluation includes adult-reported outcome assessments and parental service experiences. The parent-experience component is outside the revised scope; its inclusion is for the reported adoptee/family outcome assessment, not as adoptee testimony. Child-specific measurement details are limited in the reviewed abstract.
- Research type
- Mixed-method service evaluation
- Source reviewed
- Abstract
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- Age group
- Mixed
Study context and review
Age group as recorded: mixed
Adoption context: Domestic adoption / adoption from care
Programme: Adopting Minds mentalization-based family therapy
Institutional context: Adoption-sector service evaluation
Two authors were affiliated with Coram, an adoption service provider; the study evaluated a post-adoption therapy service. Provider involvement and incomplete outcome data should be considered when interpreting findings.
Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.
Topics: mental health, post-adoption support, service evaluation, therapy
Review scope: Source checked: Abstract. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.
Country as recorded: United Kingdom research context (sample geography not specified in abstract)
- Funding
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Commissioner
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Funder role
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Declared conflicts
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Recruitment
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Adoptee involvement
- Not yet checked for this entry
Entry: study_a71e336ca3959def