Research entry

Inputs to an Adoption Panel: A Case Study

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Inputs to an Adoption Panel: A Case Study

Terence O'Sullivan · Adoption & Fostering

An observational case study examined social work reports and the attendance of social workers and applicants at an adoption panel. Panel outputs were clearly specified, but inputs lacked a clear purpose. The author considered whether uncertainty about making decisions versus validating recommendations helped explain this pattern.

Limitations: One panel cannot represent all adoption decision-making. Observed processes and an interpretive hypothesis do not establish child outcomes or panel effectiveness. This paper and the subsequent processes-and-outputs paper report the same case study. Publication relationship: this research was published by BAAF or in its Adoption & Fostering journal, now associated with CoramBAAF, an adoption-sector organisation. Publication does not establish that the organisation conducted the research; readers may take the institutional relationship into account.

Research type
Observational case study
Source reviewed
Abstract
Peer reviewed
Yes
Age group
Mixed
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Mixed

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: O’Sullivan adoption panel observational case study

Institutional context: Adoption-sector advocacy/service organisation

Publication relationship: this research was published by BAAF or in its Adoption & Fostering journal, now associated with CoramBAAF, an adoption-sector organisation. Publication does not establish that the organisation conducted the research; readers may take the institutional relationship into account.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: adoption system, Decision-making, professional perspectives

Review scope: Source checked: Abstract. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: United Kingdom

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_5bfb0154fc25af0a

Read the source for Inputs to an Adoption Panel: A Case Study (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry