Research entry

Adoption cases reviewed: an indicative study of process and practice

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Adoption cases reviewed: an indicative study of process and practice

Barry Luckock, Karen Broadhurst · Department for Education

Researchers reconstructed twelve closed, contested adoption cases from local-authority and court files across five authorities and three court areas in England. Children waited 13–49 months from entry to care to adoption placement. The analysis described variations in decision-making, evidence preparation and oversight along these journeys.

Limitations: Twelve purposively selected historical contested cases are not representative of all adoption decisions. File interpretation is not adoptee testimony and cannot establish the frequency of delay or whether adoption was appropriate across the wider system. The authors’ evaluative judgements are not independent causal tests. Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Research type
Qualitative case-file study
Source reviewed
Full text
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Children / Adolescents
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Children / adolescents

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: Luckock–Broadhurst adoption case review

Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research

Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: administrative data, Adoption matching, adoption system, research methodology

Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_57462b38a368ead4

Read the source for Adoption cases reviewed: an indicative study of process and practice (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry