Research entry

Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: first report, 2018 to 2019

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: first report, 2018 to 2019

Rachel Blades, Matthew Cutmore, James Ronicle, Kate Smith, Rachel Wooldridge · Department for Education

This first annual evaluation combined regional-agency case studies, administrative performance data and cost analysis. Baseline data showed variation in children’s placement times between and within regions. Professionals in established agencies described shared knowledge, adopter pools and collaboration as influencing matching.

Limitations: Early implementation and professional perceptions did not establish overall effectiveness or better child outcomes. Placement-time measures and costs are system indicators, not adoptee testimony. This is a further wave of the same evaluation; it overlaps with its scoping and later reports. Parent experience is outside this summary. Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Research type
Mixed-methods implementation evaluation
Source reviewed
Full text
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Children / Adolescents
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Children / adolescents

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: Regional Adoption Agencies evaluation (2018–2021)

Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research

Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: administrative data, Adoption matching, adoption system, professional perspectives

Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_43952b1ed4aa434e

Read the source for Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: first report, 2018 to 2019 (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry