Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: first report, 2018 to 2019
This first annual evaluation combined regional-agency case studies, administrative performance data and cost analysis. Baseline data showed variation in children’s placement times between and within regions. Professionals in established agencies described shared knowledge, adopter pools and collaboration as influencing matching.
Limitations: Early implementation and professional perceptions did not establish overall effectiveness or better child outcomes. Placement-time measures and costs are system indicators, not adoptee testimony. This is a further wave of the same evaluation; it overlaps with its scoping and later reports. Parent experience is outside this summary. Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.
- Research type
- Mixed-methods implementation evaluation
- Source reviewed
- Full text
- Peer reviewed
- No
- Age group
- Children / Adolescents
Study context and review
Age group as recorded: Children / adolescents
Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways
Programme: Regional Adoption Agencies evaluation (2018–2021)
Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research
Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.
Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.
Topics: administrative data, Adoption matching, adoption system, professional perspectives
Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.
Country as recorded: England
- Funding
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Commissioner
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Funder role
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Declared conflicts
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Recruitment
- Not yet checked for this entry
- Adoptee involvement
- Not yet checked for this entry
Entry: study_43952b1ed4aa434e