Research entry

Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: final report

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: final report

Ecorys UK, Rees Centre, University of Oxford · Department for Education

The final wave combined professional interviews, agency surveys and national administrative data. Difference-in-differences analysis of pre-pandemic placement records estimated a 14-day shorter interval from placement order to placement in operational regional agencies. There was no statistically significant change in the overall interval from entry to care to adoption order.

Limitations: The non-random rollout requires assumptions about comparison trends; estimates are not experimental proof. Quantitative and interview evidence cover different periods, and COVID-19 disrupted the final wave. These are service indicators and professional accounts, not adoptee-reported wellbeing. Earlier annual reports overlap with this analysis; parent-experience findings are outside this summary. Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Research type
Mixed-methods longitudinal service evaluation
Source reviewed
Full text
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Children / Adolescents
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Children / adolescents

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: Regional Adoption Agencies evaluation (2018–2021)

Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research

Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: administrative data, Adoption matching, adoption system, longitudinal research

Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_3f83cff20e9f88d2

Read the source for Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: final report (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry