Research entry

Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: second report, 2019 to 2020

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: second report, 2019 to 2020

Ecorys UK, Rees Centre, University of Oxford · Department for Education

The second annual evaluation combined repeat agency case studies with administrative data and cost analysis. A matched-comparison analysis estimated a 14-day shorter interval from placement order to placement for children in operational regional agencies, and a 35-day shorter interval for children classified as harder to place.

Limitations: Non-random agency rollout and comparison assumptions limit causal interpretation. Results concern placement timing, not children’s subsequent wellbeing or adoptees’ accounts. The programme was still developing, and later evaluation uses overlapping data with revised methods. Parent-experience material is outside this summary. Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Research type
Mixed-methods longitudinal service evaluation
Source reviewed
Full text
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Children / Adolescents
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Children / adolescents

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: Regional Adoption Agencies evaluation (2018–2021)

Institutional context: Government / government-commissioned research

Commissioned and published by the Department for Education, which has responsibility for the adoption system evaluated. Readers may take that institutional relationship into account.

Relationship identified. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: administrative data, Adoption matching, adoption system, longitudinal research

Review scope: Source checked: Full text. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_2a11e9531d6d87d1

Read the source for Evaluation of regional adoption agencies: second report, 2019 to 2020 (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry