Research entry

The complexities of making recommendations for adoption and fostering panels: An investigation of the biographic and professional influences on panel members’ decision-making and attitudes

A summary of the study, its context and what has been checked.

Ask the Adoptee Rights Assistant
Adoptee Rights Assistant

Please leave out names and identifying details.

The complexities of making recommendations for adoption and fostering panels: An investigation of the biographic and professional influences on panel members’ decision-making and attitudes

Arlene P Weekes · University of East London / Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust

Observations of adoption and fostering panels across England, biographical interviews and panel minutes were analysed together. The researcher interpreted participants’ biographies, values and professional identities as influencing recommendations, with conflicts sometimes emerging between positions.

Limitations: This is interpretative system research rather than adoptee testimony or a quantitative test of panel fairness. The abstract does not state numbers of panels or participants. Adoption and fostering panels are combined; the author’s conclusions about impartiality are attributed interpretations.

Research type
Doctoral thesis
Source reviewed
Abstract
Peer reviewed
No
Age group
Children / Adolescents
Study context and review

Age group as recorded: Children / adolescents

Adoption context: Mixed adoption pathways

Programme: Weekes adoption and fostering panel research

Institutional context: No relationship identified in the material checked

No adoption-sector organisational relationship identified from metadata reviewed. Funding and conflicts were not comprehensively audited; this is not confirmation of institutional independence.

Bibliographic screening. Bibliographic relationships are not a bias or safety rating.

Topics: Adoption matching, adoption system, professional perspectives, research methodology

Review scope: Source checked: Abstract. This does not imply full-text or independent human verification.

Country as recorded: England

Funding
Not yet checked for this entry
Commissioner
Not yet checked for this entry
Funder role
Not yet checked for this entry
Declared conflicts
Not yet checked for this entry
Recruitment
Not yet checked for this entry
Adoptee involvement
Not yet checked for this entry

Entry: study_128d6c0ad86499bb

Read the source for The complexities of making recommendations for adoption and fostering panels: An investigation of the biographic and professional influences on panel members’ decision-making and attitudes (opens in a new tab)

Browse all studies · Suggest a correction to this entry